A Deeper Understanding of Critical Feminist Methodology
A Deeper Understanding of Critical Feminist Methodology
October 14, 2024
Contributor: Supriyono | Editor: Dadi Darmadi | Photo: M. Sufyan As-Tsauri
Depok, October 3, 2024 — The UIII Faculty of Education held a thought-provoking public lecture on Thursday, October 3, featuring Prof. Nina Nurmila, Dean of the Faculty of Education. Speaking to a packed audience in Theater Hall Faculty A, Prof. Nurmila explored the intricacies of critical feminist methodology, a vital yet often debated aspect of modern research.
Prof. Nina Nurmila is a distinguished Professor of Gender and Islamic Studies. She earned her MA from Murdoch University in 1997 and a PhD from the University of Melbourne in 2007. Her academic journey includes prestigious roles such as a Fulbright Visiting Researcher at Temple University in Philadelphia in 2000, an Endeavour Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Technology, Sydney, in 2008, and a Fulbright Visiting Professor of Islamic Studies at the University of Redlands, California, from 2008 to 2009.
Prof. Nurmila began by addressing ongoing debates from the 1990s over whether feminist methodology stands as a distinct research paradigm and methodology. She pointed out that opponents have argued against its independence, suggesting that feminist methodologies lack a unique perspective and draw heavily from established paradigms like Marxism and critical theory. Others contend that feminist approaches lack coherence due to the diverse perspectives within feminism itself.
However, Prof. Nurmila presented a compelling case for recognizing feminist methodology as unique, emphasizing its intentional rejection of male-dominated research paradigms. “Feminist researchers prioritize women’s perspectives and their societal positions, presenting a contrast to traditional methodologies focused primarily on male experiences,” she explained. She further noted that feminist research introduces a unique lens for understanding the world, often centered around the impact of patriarchy.
The criteria that define feminist methodology, as presented by Prof. Nurmila, include examining issues through a female prism, in which women are both the focus and interpreters of inquiry. Feminist methodology also encourages “consciousness raising,” a quality described as the advantage that female researchers have in understanding women’s experiences from within an “oppressed group.” She added that this “double vision” enables feminist researchers to empathize deeply and interpret their findings more accurately.
Highlighting her own work, Prof. Nurmila referenced several examples of feminist research, including her publications like “Women, Islam, and Everyday Life” (Routledge, 2009) and an article examining husband-wife dynamics (Al-Jamia’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 2013). She reflected on how feminist methodology shapes her qualitative research, occasionally integrating quantitative data while retaining a feminist analytical lens.
In her conclusion, Prof. Nurmila discussed how feminist methodologies transform traditional academic language structures, shifting from objective, passive language to more subjective, active voice. She also emphasized the importance of non-gender-biased language, advocating for inclusive terms such as “human power” rather than “manpower”.
Prof. Nurmila’s lecture left the audience with a deeper understanding of critical feminist methodology and its transformative impact on research. Through her insights, she highlighted the importance of inclusivity and empowerment within academia, calling on future researchers to consider feminist perspectives in fostering societal progress. The event exemplified UIII’s commitment to fostering an environment open to new perspectives in research, welcoming research paradigms, methodologies, and methods that advocate for societal change and scholarly diversity.
source: https://uiii.ac.id/events/read/57698/a-deeper-understanding-of-critical-feminist-methodology
Happy World Mental Health Day from UIII

Happy World Mental Health Day from UIII
October 10, 2024
By A/Prof. Charyna Ayu Rizkyanti, Ph.D*
The recent increase in student suicide cases highlights significant issues within the educational system. These cases may represent the tip of the iceberg of many intricate psychological challenges within the educational setting that have been overlooked and lack effective comprehensive solutions. To be frank, one of the vulnerable populations most likely to experience mental health problems is university students.
In 2023, over three-quarters of college students (76%) experienced moderate to serious psychological distress, with 36% of students diagnosed with anxiety, 31% meeting the criteria for suicidal ideation, and 13% having intentionally injured themselves within the year (American College Health Association, 2023). In Indonesia, it has been reported that mental disorders now often occur in the 18–25-year age group. This phenomenon is closely related to students, including college students, with about 64% of the younger generation experiencing anxiety problems, while 61.5% of them have symptoms of depression (Kemdikbud.go.id, 2023).
Serious mental health issues can affect our relationships, career, and long-term goals, including our studies, such as struggling with academic demands, adjustment issues, and managing various responsibilities. Thus, it is crucial to create a positive, safe, and supportive environment where students do not solely focus on being the best of the best in academic matters, which might lead them to become super competitive and ambitious individuals, and further, narcissistic. On top of that, it is essential to foster students and remind them that each of them is unique with different potential. As a consequence, campuses must rethink their approach (American Psychological Association, 2022). Educational institutions need to provide counseling services on campus that are equipped with counselors and psychologists who are trained to support students in need.
For students and those who have concerns, there are two things we can do at the very least to maintain mental health:
1. First and foremost, you must be able to acknowledge your thoughts and feelings.
We can’t control what’s coming to us, but we can control our response. As part of controlling our response, let’s accept our emotions, because all feelings (all emotions) are valid. Pain is a unique human experience. Don’t deny your feelings just because we don’t want to be called overly sensitive or ‘baper.’ We have the right to own it.
You may then select from a variety of responses that best suit your reaction. You have the option to avoid, modify, adapt, or simply accept the situation. In other words, allow yourself some space. Once you achieve mental clarity, your emotions will become more stable, enabling you to manage the circumstances more effectively.
2. Practice self-care, which means caring for yourself.
It includes anything we do to keep ourselves healthy — physically, mentally, and spiritually. It can be giving yourself a break that doesn’t cost anything, such as taking a walk, getting enough sleep, praying, reflecting, listening to audiobooks, meeting up with friends and family, and having a good laugh. Talking to someone, including a professional, is also part of self-care. Among so many things you can do, remind yourself to always be kind. You can be in pain but still be kind to others.
To conclude, everyone is struggling with their own mental health, including you and me. But we always have a choice to solve our problems. And we know, this too shall pass. Thus, keep embracing our values, be kind, and make space for ourselves.
One day we will say ... 'It was hard, but we made it.'
________________
*) A/Prof. Charyna Ayu Rizkyanti, Ph.D, is a mental health advocate and lecturer at the Faculty of Education, Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (UIII)
source: https://uiii.ac.id/perspectives/read/57695/happy-world-mental-health-day-from-uiii
Longitudinal Study of School Climate Instrument with Secondary School Students: Validity and Reliability Analysis with the Rasch Model

Zynuddin, S.N. & Sumintono, B. (2024).Longitudinal Study of School Climate Instrument with Secondary School Students: Validity and Reliability Analysis with the Rasch Model. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 12(4), 24-41. https://mojem.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJEM/article/view/55629
Abstract
The school climate plays a pivotal role in students’ outcomes. Previous literature has highlighted several methodological approaches employed in the school climate domain, including longitudinal studies. However, little is known about the validity and reliability of school climate instruments for longitudinal studies using Rasch analysis. Rasch model is a powerful approach to validate assessment on both item and test levels. Rasch model is coined from the probability of each response and includes item difficulty parameters to characterize the measured items. Moreover, the score represents the item and the person involved with the assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to validate school climate instruments for longitudinal studies with a six-month gap within the context of secondary school students by utilising Rasch analysis. This study evaluated aspects of reliability and validity, such as unidimensionality, rating scale analysis, item fit statistics, item targeting, and differential item functioning. A total of 1,495 secondary school students from public schools in Selangor, Malaysia, completed a 28-item Malay version of the school climate survey at Time-1 and Time-2, with a six-month gap. The results of the Rasch analysis indicated that the instrument had excellent reliability and separation indices, excellent unidimensionality and construct validity, a functional rating scale, good item-person targeting, and good item fit statistics. The current findings provided valid and reliable insights pertinent for policymakers to strategise interventions and initiatives to enhance the quality of school climate and overall education, particularly in the Asian context.
Garuda and Eagle: A Mexican Student’s Reflection on State Symbols at Indonesia’s Parliament
Garuda and Eagle: A Mexican Student’s Reflection on State Symbols at Indonesia’s Parliament
October 06, 2024
Contributor: Supriyono | Editor: Dadi Darmadi | Photo: Achmad Jatnika
It was a bright morning on September 24, 2024, when 15 students from Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (UIII), led by the International Office and Student Affairs, boarded a bus for a special visit to the Indonesian Parliament Office and House of Representatives (DPR-MPR RI) in Central Jakarta. They were attending the OIC International Youth Summit, an event organized by OIC Youth Indonesia.
Among the students was Alberto Emmanuel Conti Morales, a PhD candidate from Mexico studying at UIII’s Faculty of Education. For him, this was not just an opportunity to engage in critical discussions but also a journey through culture and symbols that stirred deep reflections on identity and nationhood.
"The place is very nice, appealing, and interesting. I never thought we would be in such a formal and important setting. I had expected something more informal, so I was pleasantly surprised," he shared, marveling at the grandeur of the building, as they arrived at Gedung Nusantara V of the parliament office.
Having visited the Mexican Parliament ten years prior, Alberto found himself comparing the two structures. "In Mexico, the parliament building is bigger, but this one feels more modern. Perhaps it's because a decade has passed since my last visit. But what really caught my attention was the difference in the atmosphere, the Indonesian parliament seems to reflect a deep sense of national pride."
Alberto was especially captivated by the Indonesian national symbols. As he sat in the parliament, his eyes were drawn to the imposing Garuda emblem, a reminder of Indonesia’s foundational values.
"In Mexico, we have a national seal too, an eagle with a snake. It’s very similar to Indonesia’s Garuda in terms of strength and symbolism. But in Indonesia, the Garuda represents more than just a national identity. It embodies the spirit of Pancasila, the philosophical foundation of the country. I found that deeply fascinating because it highlighted how much meaning Indonesians place on their symbols,” he said.
The summit Alberto visited was an annual summit held by OIC Youth Indonesia, an organization aimed at empowering and uniting young Indonesians under the values of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). It provides a platform for youth engagement on both national and international levels, promoting collaboration, leadership, and dialogue.
As the summit began, the room filled with the voices of youth leaders and speakers, all discussing the role of young people in shaping a post-OIC world. The conversation quickly turned to the importance of religion in civil society—a topic that resonated deeply with Alberto. As someone who hails from a country where religion is increasingly seen as a personal matter, he was struck by the Indonesian emphasis on faith as a core element of national unity and progress.
"The discussion was interesting, especially because of how central religion is to society here in Indonesia. In Mexico, religion is no longer a public matter; it has become something personal, something private. But here, it's clear that religion still plays a significant role in nation-building. It was eye-opening to see how much Indonesians rely on their faith in shaping their civil society," Alberto reflected.
For Alberto, the OIC International Youth Summit was more than just a political event—it was a mirror reflecting the values of a nation, a reminder of the power of symbols and faith in shaping identity. As he left the Indonesian parliament office with his fellow students, he carried with him not only the lessons from the summit but also a deeper appreciation for the cultural richness of his host country, Indonesia.
Who says that men cannot take charge of early childhood education?

Who says that men cannot take charge of early childhood education?
October 03, 2024
Contributor: Intan Fasya Zahara & Queen Salsabila | Editor: Supriyono
For too long, the field of early childhood education has been stereotyped as a profession dominated by women. Many believe that nurturing young children, guiding their early learning, and working within early childhood development is best suited to women.
However, Muhamad Maulana and Muhammad Lutfi Assidiqi, two male students from the UIII Faculty of Education (FoE), set out to challenge this perception as they decided to intern at an organization focused on early childhood education across Southeast Asia in Bandung, West Java.
From July 22nd to August 22nd, 2024, Lutfi and Maulana, along with five other students from the faculty, participated in a month-long internship at SEAMEO CECCEP, a regional organization dedicated to early childhood care and education (ECCE) and parenting across Southeast Asia.
Lutfi, who was assigned to the Advocacy and Partnership division, found the experience particularly enriching. "I was initially nervous about how I’d be received as a male in this field, but I quickly realized that my gender didn’t matter. What mattered was my contribution to the discussions and projects,” he reflected.
Lutfi's tasks were varied and challenging. He participated in policy discussions, worked on a curriculum for Cambodia, and helped prepare reports that would later be launched internationally. “Being involved in these projects helped me see that men, too, have an important role in shaping the future of early childhood education,” he added.
Similarly, Maulana, who worked in the Research and Development (RnD) division, shared his experience of facing societal assumptions. “I’m particularly aware that the field of early childhood is often associated with women,” he said. "But during the internship, I realized how much value men can bring to this field.”
Maulana’s role involved working on parenting and the child’s transition from kindergarten to elementary school. He was particularly mesmerized by how early childhood education shapes individuals’ lives into adulthood. “We’re not just dealing with children; we’re building the foundation for future generations,” he noted.
This internship experience has allowed Lutfi and Maulana to shatter preconceived notions about men in early childhood education. Their participation not only challenged societal stereotypes but also opened doors for future male students to be involved in the field. Their spirit aligns closely with the values that UIII upholds in promoting gender equality in education, particularly in early childhood.
This internship is a component of the Independent Study course offered by the Faculty of Education, allowing students to engage in self-directed projects that contribute to their future career or research growth. In addition to partnering with organizations like SEAMEO CECCEP, students have also gained internship experience at the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) and various international schools in Indonesia.
Exploring Interactive Read Aloud Literacy Learning and Quality Books in the Merdeka Curriculum
Durriyah, T. L., Niasari, C., & Afriyanti , I. (2024). Exploring Interactive Read Aloud Literacy Learning and Quality Books in the Merdeka Curriculum. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 306-319. https://pedagogia.umsida.ac.id/index.php/pedagogia/article/view/1718
Disinformasi di Youtube: Pemilihan Presiden 2019 dan 2024

Alamsyah, P., Wijaya, G., Hakim, L.N. (2024). Disinformasi di Youtube: Pemilihan Presiden 2019 dan 2024. Dalam Ningtyas, E. Jurnalisme Cek Fakta Melawan Disinformasi Pemilu 2024. (h. 15-36). Jakarta: AJI Indonesia. https://aji.or.id/data/jurnalisme-cekfakta-melawan-disinformasi-pemilu-2024
LunchTalk #33 on Educational Access for Indonesian Migrant Workers
LunchTalk #33 on Educational Access for Indonesian Migrant Workers
September 26, 2024
Contributor: Supriyono | Editor: Dadi Darmadi
The Faculty of Education at Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (UIII) held its 33rd LunchTalk on Tuesday, September 24, 2024, featuring M. Arif Rahman Hakim, PhD, a scholar in residence from UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, with the topic “The Urgency of Educational Access for Indonesian Migrant Workers in Malaysia: Policy Issues and Proposed Solutions.”
Dr. Hakim began by outlining the educational background of Indonesian migrant workers, noting that the majority—about 78%—are junior high school graduates or lower, with half having only completed elementary school. These workers often migrate due to limited job opportunities in their home villages and the prospect of earning higher wages abroad, despite most earning an average salary of MYR 2,000, far below the MYR 5,000 threshold required to bring their families to Malaysia.
During the talk, Dr. Hakim highlighted the educational programs that have been implemented for these workers. These include formal schools established by the Ministry of Education (MoE) and the Indonesian Embassy, which operate three schools across Malaysia. Universitas Terbuka, in collaboration with the Indonesian Embassy, has also developed undergraduate programs that serve over 1,300 students.
Furthermore, 17 institutions under the Sanggar Bimbingan Belajar (community learning centers) initiative provide alternative education through Package A and B programs, which are equivalent to elementary and junior high school education. Additionally, short competency courses have been introduced through collaboration between Indonesian community organizations and educational institutions in Malaysia.
The talk also touched on the role of Indonesian academics and researchers in enhancing access to education. “Scholars have been involved in sending students as volunteer teachers, developing educational modules, and conducting literacy workshops in collaboration with the Indonesian Embassy and community organizations,” Dr. Hakim emphasized.
The LunchTalk series is a flagship initiative of the UIII Faculty of Education, designed to provide an informal yet intellectually stimulating platform for scholars, practitioners, and students to engage in discussions on critical issues in education. Currently a research fellow at the Faculty, Dr. Hakim contributes his expertise in migrant education, bringing global perspectives to the local context while continuing his research on policy interventions for educational advancement.
Faculty of Education's PhD Students Present Papers on Rasch Analysis Conference: Reflection on PROMS 2024

Faculty of Education's PhD Students Present Papers on Rasch Analysis Conference: Reflection on PROMS 2024
Attending the Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Society (PROMS) 2024 conference on 20-21 August was a very enriching experience for us as a group. The theme of this year's PROMS was Advancing Rasch Measurement Practically and Responsibly which was held at UCMI City Campus, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. This was the 19th PROMS event. God willing, next year's PROMS will be held in Singapore. As four people who are deeply immersed in the field of measurement in education, we are very proud to have the opportunity to interact with global experts. Some of the keynote speakers were our role models in learning and whose books we refer to. They were Prof. Trevor G Bond (Founder of PROMS), Prof George Engelhard (University of Georgia), Dr Haniza Yon (Malaysian Psychometrics Association), Harris Shah Abd Hamid, Ph.D. (University College of MAIWP) and our role model lecturer in Educational Assessment from Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, Bambang Sumintono, Ph.D. These reflections aim to capture the essence of our collective experience, highlighting the key insights we gained, the challenges we faced, and the implications for our future work.
Diverse Perspectives and Global Collaboration
The opening ceremony on the morning of August 20th set a collaborative and inspiring tone for the conference. Welcoming speeches by Dr. Harris Shah Abd Hamid, Dean of FPPK, and Prof. Dr. George Engelhard, President of PROMS, emphasized the importance of cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural collaboration in advancing educational measurement practices. Throughout the two-day conference, we participated in numerous parallel sessions held in various rooms across the campus. These sessions provided platforms for researchers from different backgrounds to present their work. Each parallel room is chaired by a local committee and attended by at least one Rasch expert who are also PROMS board member, giving input and facilitating rich discussions and exchanges of ideas. We were particularly inspired by the presentations that showcased innovative applications of Rasch modeling in diverse educational contexts, highlighting how these techniques can be adapted to meet the specific needs of learners around the world.
Four delegates from UIII PhD students presented papers with their respective scientific fields but used the Rasch Model as a data analysis technique. All the presented papers are the result coming from the process of joining class in Educational Assessment which was taught by our lecturer at Faculty of Education at Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia. We challenge ourselves to present in this global conference to learn further and get insight internationally. In the first parallel session, Faradillah Haryani presented a paper entitled: Spatial Orientation Assessment: Investigating Differences Between Residents Of Jogja and Non-Jogja Areas Using Rasch Measurement Model, then in a different parallel class Novinta Nurulsari presented with the title paper Misconception Detection Using Rasch Modeling in Thermodynamics, then still in the same class Eka Yusmaita presented with the title of the paper Chemical Literacy Assessment on Green Chemistry Topic Using Many-Facet Rasch (MFRM) and finally Muhammad Affan Ramadhana presented Rating Behaviour Difference Between Lecturers from ‘Language Education’ and ‘Linguistics/Literature’ Background in an Online EFL Writing Assessment Context.
This conference provided us for networking and building connections with fellow attendees. Informal interactions during breaks and the PROMS Dinner at Rumah Tangsi on the evening of August 20th allowed us to engage in meaningful conversations, discuss potential collaborations, and broaden our professional network. These interactions underscored the collaborative spirit of PROMS and reinforced our commitment to contributing to a global community dedicated to advancing objective measurement in education.
Key Insights and Personal Reflections
One of the most memorable aspects of the conference was the chance to meet some of the world’s leading experts in Rasch measurement theory. Interacting with prominent scholars like Prof. Dr. George Engelhard, Prof. Dr. Trevor Bond, and Prof. Dr. Yan Zi was both inspiring and humbling. Additionally, seeing our own lecturer, Dr. Bambang, among these figures further reinforced the importance of our work. Dr. Bambang himself delivered an insightful keynote on the second day of the conference (21st August 2024), which was followed by, yet another thought-provoking session led by Dr. Harris Shah Abd Hamid later that afternoon.
Novinta said, “I was particularly impressed by the quality of the keynote presentations. Every speaker brought forward innovative ideas and advanced research, but one of the most captivating sessions for me was on the ‘Next Generation of Attitude Measurement.’ The discussions opened my eyes to new possibilities in the field and underscored the importance of evolving our methods to stay relevant in an ever-changing educational landscape. In addition to the keynote speeches, the presentations by other speakers were outstanding. I gained a wealth of new knowledge, with one of the most intriguing topics being unfolding assessment. This concept was new to me and captured my attention due to its potential applications in my own work. Presenting my research at this prestigious event was a particularly valuable experience. Sharing my findings with an international audience and receiving feedback from experts in the field provided me with new perspectives on my research. This experience not only boosted my confidence but also inspired me to continue exploring and refining my work.”
Eka, on the other hand revealed that “This is a very high-quality conference that I have visited, I followed it solemnly. Every presenter who presented, the expert would provide supporting input and even explain the theory of the Rasch Model on the Whiteboard until we were amazed at their delivery. We hope that in the future we can remain part of the Rasch Model community and can continue to attend this conference for the following years.”
Faradillah observed that the Rasch experts in each session provided feedback in a manner that was not only insightful but also encouraging. Even in sessions where the focus was not primarily on Rasch, the experts skillfully demonstrated how the method could be applied to enhance the research, pointing out areas where existing approaches were lacking. This approach showed that the prominent figures in these discussions were open to different paradigms and encouraged deeper exploration rather than dismissing alternative views. Faradillah was particularly pleased with the positive reception of her presentation, even though it was recognized that further work, such as increasing the sample size, was necessary. The findings resonated with the international audience, as they see unique cultural aspects of Indonesian people, measured through Rasch modeling. Additionally, Faradillah gained valuable insights from Professor Trevor Bond, who emphasized that Reliability is number, and Validity is more into number. This point was especially important, as it challenged the common practice of describing reliability and validity solely with numerical descriptions.
Finally, Affan presented his work on how lecturers from language education and lecturers from linguistics/literature background behave differently in their rating severity in the context of writing assessment. His work is based on a preliminary study conducted as preparation for his dissertation research. “I was a bit nervous at the beginning, seeing many people including some Rasch experts in the room. I tried to explain as clearly as I could, but I think I was too fast.” Affan said.
Affan continued, “But it was insightful for me when one of the audience members asked for clarification if the rater participants in my study were prepared with the rubric or not. I said no. Then, he emphasized the possibility of raters who do not understand clearly the meaning of each category in the rubric might cause errors and became the most important factor that causes their rating behavior.” It was later revealed that he is Jeffrey Durant, one of Rasch expert from Toyo Gakuen University Japan, whose works focus on multirater assessment and rater network construction in large-scale multirater assessment. “He said that my study was interesting, and he gave me his contact for further discussion.”
Implications for Future Work
The insights gained from PROMS 2024 will undoubtedly shape our future work. The advanced understanding of Rasch modeling will be directly applicable to our ongoing research projects. For Novinta, this will enhance her efforts in detecting misconceptions in educational settings. Faradillah will be focusing on increasing the sample size to enable Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis. Eka plans to expand the study of the Multi-Facet Rasch Model and increase the number of persons to improve item reliability scores. Affan will also leverage these insights to further his research in multirater assessment, especially in preparing rater training and more detailed analysis on rater behavior, by applying Rasch modeling to achieve more robust results. We are now better equipped to refine our methodologies and improve the accuracy and fairness of our assessments.
Conclusion
Overall, PROMS 2024 was a transformative experience for us as a group. The opportunity to engage with leading experts, learn about cutting-edge research, and reflect on our own practices has had a profound impact on our professional development. We leave the conference with a renewed sense of purpose and a commitment to applying the knowledge and insights gained to our future work. We are excited about the potential for future collaborations and look forward to continuing our journey in the field of educational measurement with a deeper understanding and a broader perspective.









