Looking to the education policy in action is very interesting. On Monday, December 22, 2025, we are going to the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education (MoPSE) to know more about that. All my classmates from the Educational Policy Analysis class  are scheduled to have a discussion with the Education Standards, Curriculum, and Assessment Agency (BSKAP), specifically the Centre for Education Standards and Policy (PSKP), which handles Indonesia’s national education policy or regarding National Education Standards. The topic of this visit is discussing the Draft Law on the new National Education System (RUU Sisdiknas), which is included in the 2025 Priority National Legislation Program (Prolegnas). The status of the bill is currently in the discussion and refinement stage in parliament. We are guided by our lectures from the Educational Policy Analyst class, Dr. Lukman Nul Hakim and R. Alpha Amirrachman, M.Phil., Ph.D., on this agenda and prior to the visit, we were given some reading materials related to the draft Law (bill) from our lectures to enrich the discussion.

This visit truly excited me and sparked great enthusiasm. This was due to my second visit to MoPSE as a student at Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (UIII), but also because the focus of this discussion was directly related to education policy, which is my current field of interest and concentration study. Furthermore, this visit provided an opportunity for us as students to learn more about the evolution of Indonesian Education Law. This discussion provided a glimpse into the perspectives of stakeholders directly involved in the decision-making process. Through this interaction, we gained a deeper understanding of the sequence of policy formation at the national level. This allowed me as a student to understand the lengthy process of drafting a law and the various parties involved in its formation. This provided a collaborative experience for students, bridging theoretical learning in the classroom to the real-world practice.

In this regard, we gathered in the morning to the Jakarta for the Ministry office towards the departure. Upon arrival at MoPSE, we were greeted by the Policy Analysis and Advocacy Working Team from the ministry. We arrived a little earlier than planned, and we didn’t waste our time there; we were discussing something else instead. Guided by Pak Alpha, we opened our initially discussion with Mr. Lukman and Ms. Esy about submitting students’ work (e.g articles) to the ministry journals. They informed us that there are two journals that students can submit to: “Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan” (Journal of Education Policy Research) & “Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan” (Journal of Education and Culture). Several explanations were given regarding what students need to consider when submitting their papers to journals, including the journal’s twice-yearly publication timeline. I think this is very insightful, apart from the main material discussed that day, we also got information about where we can publish our scientific work.

Afterward, at 10 am, we are going to the main agenda, a discussion with the Head of the Center for Education Standards and Policy, Mr. Irsyad Zamjani, Ph.D. Prior to the discussion, we were briefly introduced before Mr. Irsyad continued with his presentation. He presented material on The Revision of the National Education System Law, starting with explaining the evolution of education policy in Indonesia and the background of why the revision of the Indonesian education law is necessary. He also added about the stages in the Sisdiknas Revision which consists of 5 stages of the legislation process, which begins with Initiation, Preparation, Discussion, Reflection and it ends with Determination. In addition to that, he explained that MoPSE has supported this legislation process and provided us a brief overview of what activities have been carried out by MoPSE during 2025.

There are several key revisions highlighted in this change to the education system. This change is arguably quite massive because it goes beyond policy as a philosophical foundation to include substantive studies. Several aspects can serve as students’ takeaways, for example, educational governance and pathways, compulsory education, curriculum and learning, teacher welfare, and educational funding. One of my takeaways from this discussion is the extension of compulsory education from 9 to 13 years. One of the hot topics in education frequently discussed both inside and outside the classroom is how the acknowledgment of early childhood education (ECE) takes place, and this is one of them. The addition of one year of compulsory education to ECE acknowledges that preschool education is as important as other levels of education.

The discussion then continued with a question-and-answer session. Students appeared very enthusiastic in listening to Mr. Irsyad’s presentation, as evidenced by the large number of students who raised questions. The questions asked by the students were very diverse; this may reflect our interest in the field of discussion. Some of them concerned indigenous communities, distant learning, educational budgeting, language policy, and concerns on the average length of schooling. Towards the end of the discussion, he added regarding the discussion of the Revision of the National Education System Law, MoPSE did not work alone, but also participated by inviting several related stakeholders and non-governmental organizations in the discussion regarding this legislation process.