UIII Hosts Book Forum Highlighting Gender, Disability, and Religious Diversity in Classrooms
UIII Hosts Book Forum Highlighting Gender, Disability, and Religious Diversity in Classrooms
May 15, 2025
Contributor: Supriyono | Editor: Dadi Darmadi | Photo: Alief Fathan
In an effort to amplify classroom voices and enrich the national conversation on students’ literacy and inclusivity, the Jusuf Kalla Library at UIII held a Book Forum featuring the authors of ‘Putri, Angpau dan Topi Duka’. The event offered a space for reflection and dialogue on how children’s literature can be a powerful medium to discuss gender, disability, and religious diversity in educational settings.
The book, written in Bahasa Indonesia by Dr. Sofie Dewayani, Dr. Tati L. Durriyah, and Asep Ropiudin, was the product of a two-year collaborative research project involving educators from multiple universities and foundations across Indonesia. Moderated by Asep Ropiudin himself, the discussion centered around how classrooms can become spaces to introduce social issues for children utilizing meaningful stories and literature.
“Seeing this book physically—it feels like a dream,” said Dr. Tati L. Durriyah, recalling the project’s beginnings during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2022. “It took years of hard work, delays, and collaborative efforts. We designed this book specifically for practitioners, using accessible language and authentic classroom experiences.”
The book follows the experiences of three master teachers from various regions of Indonesia as they navigate discussions on identity and inclusion through literature in their classrooms. These stories, the authors argue, are often overlooked in national discourses around students’ literacy, which tend to focus on rankings and generalized assumptions.
Dr. Sofie Dewayani emphasized the importance of listening to students’ stories, noting, “When we zoom in to the classroom level, there are powerful narratives created by children. If we truly listen to them, we’ll realize they are literate—they just need something to connect with.”
She shared one example from the book in which a teacher introduced the story of Ratna Komala, a tale that reverses traditional gender roles with a brave sister rescuing her brother. “This flips the usual portrayal of women as passive figures awaiting rescue,” Dr. Dewayani explained. “And it prompted a classroom conversation about women’s roles in society, even touching on issues like why women might not receive holiday bonuses.”
The forum also highlighted another story in the book about the friendship between an Indonesian girl and an Afghan refugee—used in class to foster dialogue about borders, identity, and shared humanity. “We believe a book comes to life only when a teacher facilitates critical discussion,” said Dr. Dewayani.
In a time when there is growing concern over students’ literacy rates and reading habits in Indonesia, the forum underscored the importance of going beyond numbers to spotlight lived experiences and classroom conversations. By sharing these teacher-led stories, the book encourages educators to approach literacy not just as a skill, but as a gateway to critical thinking, empathy, and inclusivity.
Professor Yan Zi’s Call for Rethinking Assessment in the Age of AI
Professor Yan Zi’s Call for Rethinking Assessment in the Age of AI
May 14, 2025
Contributor: Supriyono | Editor: Dadi Darmadi | Photo: Achmad Jatnika
At the 4th Annual Conference hosted by UIII Faculty of Education, Professor Yan Zi of the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at The Education University of Hong Kong delivered a keynote that challenged the status quo of classroom assessment. His central argument: the future of effective learning in a digital age lies in synergising teacher-directed and student-initiated formative assessments, especially as education embraces the capabilities—and caveats—of generative AI.
In a presentation titled “Synergising Teacher-directed and Student-initiated Assessment in the Digital Learning Environment,” Professor Yan offered a research-grounded framework for what he called a “meaningful assessment ecology.” This ecology, he explained, must blend two major forces, namely teacher-driven assessment-for-learning and student-led assessment-as-learning.
Traditionally, formative assessment has relied heavily on teacher direction where teachers monitor student learning and adjust teaching strategies accordingly. This model has value, said Professor Yan, but it alone cannot unlock the full potential of student learning.
To complement this, Professor Yan spotlighted student-initiated assessment—or assessment-as-learning—where learners actively engage in self-assessment and metacognitive reflection. Drawing from his work developing the Self-assessment Practices Scale (SaPS), he demonstrated how this approach empowers students to take ownership of their learning, fosters self-regulated learning (SRL), and enhances academic outcomes.
Crucial for student-initiated assessment, Professor Yan highlighted the interplay between feedback literacy and self-assessment. He argued that these are not separate domains; feedback literacy fuels effective self-assessment, and vice versa. He elaborated that both processes centered on active student involvement and co-regulation, challenging conventional views of feedback as a one-way street from teacher to student.
In regards to feedback, Professor Yan then elaborated the role of generative AI—particularly tools like ChatGPT—in reshaping feedback and assessment. Generative AI, he explained, has the potential to make feedback more timely, personalized, and accessible. It democratizes assessment by shifting power to the learner.
However, he offered several cautionary notes, saying that students may struggle with using appropriate prompts, evaluating AI-generated responses, or may become overly dependent on AI outputs without critical reflection. “ChatGPT may be a game-changer,” he said, “but it still depends on the player.”
A recent study cited by Professor Yan revealed that while students showed cognitive engagement with ChatGPT, their behavioral engagement was often superficial. Emotional resistance was low, but trust levels varied. He warned that without proper cultivation of feedback literacy, students may not reap the full benefits of AI-enhanced learning environments.
Hence, Professor Yan called for a “bottom-up assessment reform,” advocating for an assessment culture that is not only methodologically diverse—encompassing theoretical, quantitative, and qualitative approaches—but also deeply grounded in stakeholder engagement, including students, teachers, and parents.
Professor Yan’s lecture marked a significant intellectual moment in the ongoing dialogue on education transformation at UIII. As digital tools become increasingly embedded in pedagogy, his message serves as both a roadmap and a reminder: technology should enhance, not replace, the human dimensions of teaching and learning.
source: https://uiii.ac.id/professor-yan-zis-call-for-rethinking-assessment-in-the-age-of-ai/
Dr. Bahrul Hayat: Reimagining Educational Assessment as a Tool for Equity
Dr. Bahrul Hayat: Reimagining Educational Assessment as a Tool for Equity
May 10, 2025
Contributor: Supriyono | Editor: Dadi Darmadi | Photo: Achmad Jatnika
In a compelling presentation at the 4th International Conference organized by UIII Faculty of Education, Dr. Bahrul Hayat, large-scale education assessment expert and former Secretary General of Indonesia’s Ministry of Religious Affairs, emphasized the transformative potential of educational assessment when it is designed and implemented with equity at its core.
Drawing from his rich background in education policy and research, the former UIII Vice- Rector for Academic Affairs argued that assessment is more than a tool for grading—it is a mechanism that shapes the trajectory of learning, access, and opportunity across the education system.
He began by outlining the functions of educational assessment, saying beyond individual student evaluations, assessments are used on a larger scale to track the quality of education systems. When used effectively, he said, assessment provides evidence of how well students are achieving learning objectives and guides decisions related to learning placement, diagnostics, grade promotion, and certification.
However, Dr. Hayat warned its potential drawback, saying that while assessment can help identify learning achievement gaps, support responsive teaching, and inform targeted interventions, they risk to marginalize students by misrepresenting their abilities or limit their opportunities if they are designed with bias, low validity, or without contextual sensitivity. “Assessment has a dual role in educational equity,” he explained. “It can be a tool for justice or a vehicle for exclusion.”
Reflecting on current assessment practices, Dr. Hayat highlighted the multilayered threats. These include rigid item formats, content that lacks curricular relevance, differential item functioning across student groups, and construct-irrelevant variance. On the administrative level, challenges include uniform testing modes, non-adaptive assessments, lack of accommodations, and digital inequality. Additionally, scoring and interpretation practices—such as the use of raw scores, norm-referenced grading, and standardized rubrics—can also introduce bias, particularly when student diversity is not taken into account.
Hence, central to his presentation, Dr. Hayat called for the equitable practice of assessment. He stressed that assessments must be fair, contextualized, and aligned with clearly defined learning outcomes. Students should be given varied and meaningful opportunities to demonstrate their learning, according to their physical and psychological conditions.
To achieve this, Dr. Hayat outlined six foundational principles for equitable assessment: validity and reliability; transparency and accountability; accommodations for special needs; cultural fairness; student-centered design; and opportunity to learn. These principles, he emphasized, are non-negotiable if assessments are to serve their intended purpose of supporting all learners.
Quoting education experts like W. James Popham and Linda Darling-Hammond, Dr. Hayat emphasized that assessments should be tools for learning, not instruments of gatekeeping. “We must ensure that our assessments are fair and instructionally informative, rather than tools that perpetuate privilege or punish disadvantage,” he said. His call to action was clear: the design and implementation of educational assessments must be inclusive, context-aware, and grounded in evidence to genuinely support equitable outcomes for all students.
Dr. Hayat concluded his presentation by urging education stakeholders to rethink the role of assessment not as a final judgment but as an ongoing support mechanism. If done right, he noted, assessments can help reduce learning disparities, inform meaningful interventions, and empower every learner to reach their full potential. His message resonated deeply with UIII’s mission to spark dialogue on how to build a more just and responsive education system—starting with the way we assess.
source: https://uiii.ac.id/dr-bahrul-hayat-reimagining-educational-assessment-as-a-tool-for-equity/
How Does Culture Fit In? Rethinking Inclusive Assessment with Assoc. Prof. Joanna Tai
How Does Culture Fit In? Rethinking Inclusive Assessment with Assoc. Prof. Joanna Tai
May 10, 2025
Contributor: Supriyono | Editor: Dadi Darmadi | Photo: Achmad Jatnika
At the 4th Annual Conference on Assessment and Evaluation hosted by the UIII Faculty of Education, Associate Professor Joanna Tai of Deakin University delivered a thought-provoking keynote titled “Designing Assessment for Inclusion: How Does Culture Fit In?” Her message was clear: inclusive assessment must go beyond fairness in form and structure; it must account for the cultural contexts that shape learning, expression, and success.
Drawing from her research at the Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE), she reconsidered long-held assumptions about objectivity and equality in academic assessment. “Assessment should recognise diversity in student learning and endeavour to ensure that no student is discriminated against by virtue of features other than their ability to meet appropriate standards,” she quoted her 2023 co-authored publication. But she followed with a more pressing question: “What about culture?”
In her keynote, Assoc. Prof. Tai unpacked hidden cultural assumptions in common assessment practices. Assessment, she argued, is not culturally neutral. Academic traditions, societal values, and educational systems all shape how students are expected to demonstrate knowledge. Yet, despite its significance, her research revealed a critical gap: most literature on assessment and inclusion fails to explicitly define “culture.”
A scoping review she conducted for relevant publication between 2005 and 2025 found only nine studies that meaningfully addressed cultural dimensions of assessment, despite the global push for equity and diversity in higher education. She also highlighted that the definitions of culture in the relevant literature were just assumed and not explicit.
She then introduced a set of emerging design principles for cultural inclusion in assessment, saying that, first, assessment must be future-oriented, preparing students for their real-world, context-specific futures. Second, it should foster shared social understanding, encouraging dialogue and reflection among students and educators about what is valued in learning—and why.
Assoc. Prof. Tai further advocated for collaborative assessments that promote intercultural exchange, especially in multicultural classrooms. For this, she introduced three strategies for assessment design, encapsulated in authenticity, programmatic view, and distinctiveness.
Authenticity in assessment, she said, involves aligning tasks with students’ values and goals (authenticity to self), setting clear expectations (authenticity of task), recognizing differing perceptions (designed vs perceived authenticity), and including diverse students in design (authenticity in our values).
For the programmatic view of assessment, she encouraged that learning outcomes are scaffolded over time, and not everything has to be assessed at every occasion. Meanwhile, distinctiveness highlight that students should be prepared for their unique destinations, utilizing open-ended tasks to develop their distinct capabilities and offering a variety of ways to demonstrate learning aligns with Universal Design for Learning.
Assoc. Prof. Tai’s keynote concluded with a reminder that designing assessment for inclusion is not a one-off event, but an ongoing, systemic process. It involves multiple stakeholders, continuous dialogue, and a willingness to challenge entrenched academic norms. Her presentation sparked thoughtful discussion throughout the conference and set a transformative tone for UIII’s broader vision of equitable, culturally responsive education.
Joanna Tai finds a wonderful welcome for her Assessment for Inclusion Keynote
Recently Associate Professor Joanna Tai was invited to give a keynote at the Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia Faculty of Education 4th annual conference, which was about “Assessment and Equity in Education”. Here, she shares some of her reflections on the conference.
Members of Deakin and Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (UIII) have been partners and collaborators for several years, and I was excited to contribute to the growing relationship by accepting the invitation to be a keynote speaker at the UIII Faculty of Education 4th annual conference. UIII is a relatively new university and the Faculty of Education has so far accepted four cohorts of Masters and PhD students, who were all in enthusiastic attendance alongside their Faculty members. The Faculty are small in number but mighty in productivity: in addition to offering four theme streams across the Masters and PhD programmes, they also edit a journal, Muslim Education Review, host visiting scholars, run an annual conference, and are soon to be admitting undergraduate students.
It was my first time visiting Indonesia, despite it being one of our closest neighbours, and I’m glad I had such welcoming hosts. UIII is situated in Depok, about one hour from Jakarta airport, and I was collected and returned to the hotel each day by a pair of volunteer students. The roads and traffic were definitely something I wouldn’t have wanted to navigate on my own! On arrival, the campus seemed vast, and the buildings were impressive – including an eight-floor library! Being an international university, they are building a collection across many languages – Bahasa Indonesia, English, Arabic, and several others.
So now, to the conference itself. After a lovely opening ceremony with a traditional Indonesian dance performance representing the different regions (put on by students from the Faculty!), I had the honour of being the opening keynote speaker. With a topic like designing assessment for inclusion, it’s always hard to tell exactly which aspects will be most pertinent for a broad audience.
I focused my talk on considering how culture might be acknowledged and incorporated in inclusive ways
My work with our own CRADLE Indonesian students has helped me to understand how Indonesia is a place of many cultures and languages. This seemed to resonate with many of the attendees, and we had an excellent discussion session afterwards which demonstrated how attentive they’d been – even more impressive, since English (as I learned from some students with a linguistics background) is frequently a third, fourth, or even further down the list language for many people.
Professor Bahrul Hayat followed with his keynote immediately after, discussing the importance of large scale educational assessment and its potential impact on equity. It was great to hear the same underlying messages about the purposes of education from a different perspective. Professor Yan Zi from the Education University of Hong Kong (and CRADLE Honorary Professor) also gave his keynote to open the second day, highlighting the importance of student agency even within teacher-constructed systems, and offering implications for what we might do about learning and assessment in a digital world.
I had the opportunity to also attend some of the panel sessions, with presentations from scholars representing several institutions. Again, I was impressed by the quality of discussion and interaction amongst participants – and chuffed to see work by CRADLE colleagues and collaborators referenced in presentations.
Beyond the intellectual climate, the food was also delicious, with snacks in the morning, and a full cooked lunch showcasing typical Indonesian food. The conference dinner took place on the first day, and what started as a singing performance turned into karaoke for staff and students. Of course, I had to participate (thanks Dr Destina for being my duet partner!) too. One notable difference between Indonesia and Australia is the importance of photos: I was happy to pose with many students and now also have a great collection of memories from the conference. With the ongoing connection between institutions, I hope we’ll meet again in the future!
Assessment for All: Equity Takes Center Stage at FoE’s 4th International Conference
Assessment for All: Equity Takes Center Stage at FoE’s 4th International Conference
May 10, 2025
Contributor: Supriyono | Editor: Dadi Darmadi | Photo: Achmad Jatnika
The two-day event brought together over a hundred participants, including scholars, educators, researchers, and students from Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, and Hong Kong, who engaged in meaningful discussions on the intersection between assessment practices and equitable access to education.
In his opening remarks, UIII Rector Prof. Dr. Jamhari emphasized the university’s commitment to holistic education and its role in addressing global educational challenges. “As institutions of higher learning, our responsibilities reach far beyond the classroom. We must actively engage with society, build meaningful partnerships, and apply our academic strengths to help solve real-world issues and support national progress,” said Prof. Jamhari.
He also expressed gratitude to the keynote speakers, educational assessment experts Prof. Bahrul Hayat of UIII, Associate Professor Joanna Tai (Deakin University, Australia), and Prof. Yan Zi (The Education University of Hong Kong) for their valuable insights and contributions to the academic exchange.
Dean of the Faculty of Education, Prof. Nina Nurmila, provided an overview of the conference’s background, aligning it with the faculty’s core areas of concentration. “Our annual conference rotates around four key concentrations of our study programs,” she explained. “This year, we focus on Educational Assessment and Evaluation. Next year, we will revisit the theme of Education and Society.” She also highlighted how the conference serves multiple goals beyond academic dialogue.
“Our aim is to provide a platform for senior and junior scholars to share research, foster networking for future collaborations, promote our growing campus, and enhance the visibility of our journal Muslim Education Review (MER)—which is now SINTA 3 accredited and striving toward Scopus indexing,” said Prof. Nurmila.
Chair of the organizing committee, Dr. Destina Wahyu Winarti, underscored the theme’s relevance in light of global educational trends. “Assessment plays a significant role in measuring students’ learning performance and guiding educational decisions,” Dr. Winarti noted. “But equity ensures that all students—regardless of background—have access to the resources they need to succeed.”
She reported that after a rigorous peer-review process involving two external reviewers per submission, 54 papers were accepted and presented over the course of the conference. These contributions will have the opportunity to be published in the Muslim Education Review.
The opening ceremony also featured an international cultural performance by UIII students, celebrating the university’s commitment to diversity, and concluded with the announcement of awards for best lecturer, best student writing, and best paper submission. With this, the Faculty of Education’s conference has clearly established itself not only as a site of rigorous academic exchange but also as a welcoming space for global collaboration, cultural dialogue, and educational innovation.
Teachers Teaching Themselves: Is It the End of Teacher’s Formal Development Program?
Teachers Teaching Themselves: Is It the End of Teachers' Formal Development Program?
April 24, 2025
Contributor: Virda Lalitya Umam | Editor: Supriyono | Photo: Afra Fahira
In a time when conventional professional development programs often fall out of sync with digital transformation, Indonesian teachers are finding a new way in improving their competencies—through their smartphones. This was the key insight imparted by Dr. Teguh Khaerudin at the 39th Lunch Talk hosted online by the UIII Faculty of Education on March 25, 2025.
Under the title "Empowering EFL Teachers: How Emerging Technologies Drive Informal Learning," the UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta lecturer gave insights into how informal learning is shifting and reshaping the professional development journey of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) teachers in Indonesia.
The insight was drawn from a qualitative case study—part of his PhD research project, sampling eight Indonesian EFL teachers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, Dr. Khaerudin's research aimed to uncover how teachers utilize informal digital learning to integrate technology into their teaching practices.
However, the findings revealed a broader narrative: ‘digital content platforms, social media groups, and online webinars emerged as the primary sources of professional learning for these teachers’. These tools, he said, helped them overcome challenges posed by geography, lack of institutional support, and even poor internet access.
Among the platforms used, WhatsApp and YouTube stood out as some of the most impactful. WhatsApp facilitated peer consultations and brought together teaching communities—playing a pivotal role in building networks, especially in rural regions. Teachers connected through group chats to exchange lesson plans, troubleshoot technical problems, and share resources during lockdowns.
YouTube, on the other hand, was the go-to for step-by-step learning. Teachers didn't just to learn how to use educational software but also to explore new pedagogical techniques, design engaging materials, and even create their own instructional videos.
As such, these learning strategies cover a broad area, which Dr. Khaerudin categorized as collaborative and independent Informal Teacher Learning (ITL). However, a critical question emerged: Can such informal learning initiatives replace the formal professional development (PD) program? Despite their significance, Dr. Khaerudin argued that ITL is not a substitute for formal professional development (PD), but rather a valuable complement to it.
“While many formal PD programs are rigid, overly broad, and one-size-fits-all, Informal Teacher Learning (ITL) is self-paced, responsive to needs, and tailored to each teacher's environment,” Dr. Khaerudin said. “Informal learning fills the gap between training and practice, allowing educators to adapt quickly, explore new ideas, and reflect on what works.”
Hence, Dr. Khaerudin highlighted the significant implications of ITL, urging the stakeholders to integrate them into formal professional development frameworks, invest in adequate digital infrastructure, support teacher-led communities, and foster a learning culture for educators and learners alike. He also called for further research into how digital tools can be optimized for sustainable, high-quality learning.
He, though, warned that digital platforms are not absent from challenges. Issues such as misinformation and content overload can hinder the learning process, which in turn emphasizes the need for digital literacy and critical evaluation skills.
Dr. Khaerudin’s suggestions resonate deeply with UIII’s mission to foster educational advancement through cutting-edge research and technological innovation. By promoting adaptive, self-directed learning models and encouraging the use of emerging digital tools, his suggestions mirror UIII’s commitment to empowering educators and learners alike in navigating the evolving landscape of 21st-century education.
Kindergarten in Lockdown: How Do Leaders Kept Learning Alive?
Kindergarten in Lockdown: How Do Leaders Kept Learning Alive?
April 8, 2025
Contributor: Virda Lalitya Umam | Editor: Supriyono | Photo: Nurul Fatimah
Continuing its commitment to fostering scholarly discussions, the Faculty of Education at Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (UIII) hosted its 38th LunchTalk on Tuesday, February 25, 2025. This session featured Yohan Rubiyantoro, Ph.D. from the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education, who presented his research on how kindergarten leaders adapted to the unprecedented challenges of distance learning during the COVID-19 crisis.
In his presentation, titled ‘Case Studies of School Resilience: Kindergarten Leadership During Crisis’, Dr. Rubiyantoro highlighted the pivotal role of early childhood education leaders in ensuring learning continuity amid disruptions. He began by outlining Indonesia’s education system, emphasizing the structured yet decentralized framework that places school principals at the forefront of crisis management.
Dr. Rubiyantoro’s study focused on four public kindergartens across different regions of Indonesia, examining how school leaders, teachers, and parents navigated the abrupt shift to remote learning from September to December 2021. The findings underscored significant challenges, including limited digital literacy among teachers and students, inadequate ICT infrastructure, and socio-economic disparities affecting access to online education.
The study revealed varied responses across regions. In eastern Indonesia, many kindergartens struggled with poor internet connectivity and teachers unfamiliar with digital tools, making distance learning nearly impossible. In contrast, some schools in western Indonesia discreetly continued in-person learning, citing concerns over young children’s ability to engage with virtual lessons.
In Jakarta, rapid adaptation was evident as teachers were trained to use digital platforms and create engaging video lessons. Meanwhile, in central Indonesia, schools leaned on strong community support, collaborating with parents to develop alternative learning strategies, including home-based activities and shared educational resources.
Dr. Rubiyantoro emphasized that the success of kindergarten leaders during this crisis hinged on their ability to adapt, communicate effectively with teachers and parents, and embrace digital learning. He advocated for improved crisis management training and investment in ICT infrastructure to better equip schools for future disruptions.
As Indonesia advances in digital transformation, Dr. Rubiyantoro’s insights underscore the importance of resilient and innovative leadership in early childhood education. Through this LunchTalk session, UIII’s Faculty of Education reaffirms its dedication to preparing future educational leaders to navigate uncertainties and shape a more inclusive and adaptable learning landscape.
