
Year: 2024 | Faculty: FIP
Activity date status: Exact activity date not available in the accessible spreadsheet/public sources
Verification note: Only year 2024 is available in the spreadsheet.
Source metadata: PKM: Strengthening Lecturers’ Assessment Competence in Education: The Utilization of Rasch Model | Tim: Bambang Sumintono, Fitri Amalia, Nabila Nindya Alifia Putri
Assessment is one of the most decisive parts of education. A test does not merely produce scores; it shapes how students understand their progress and how lecturers evaluate learning. UIII’s community engagement project on the utilization of the Rasch Model responded to this challenge by strengthening lecturers’ competence in evidence-based educational assessment.
The Faculty of Education team introduced the Rasch Model as a powerful approach in educational measurement. The model helps lecturers examine the relationship between student ability and item difficulty, making it possible to evaluate whether an instrument is functioning as intended. This is important because assessment quality affects fairness, accuracy, and the credibility of academic decisions.
The activity was not only about statistics. It encouraged lecturers to reflect on how assessment instruments are designed, interpreted, and improved. When educators understand the strengths and weaknesses of their instruments, they can revise learning evaluation in ways that better serve students and academic standards.
For UIII, the project shows how technical expertise can support educational justice. A more accurate assessment system helps ensure that students are judged by valid evidence rather than by poorly designed tests or unclear criteria. This is directly relevant to the wider agenda of quality assurance in higher education.
A feature story can make the topic accessible by explaining that better measurement leads to better learning decisions. It should include the training venue, participants, software or analytical tools used, and comments from lecturers about what they learned. The strongest angle is that educational quality is built not only in classrooms and curricula, but also in the instruments used to understand what students have truly learned.
